Vanessa Szalapski and Steve Lucke have provided an in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in Intel Corp. Inv. Policy Comm. v. Sulyma, 140 S. Ct. 768 (2020) at the Dorsey Health Law Blog. In Sulyma, the Supreme Court defined what constitutes “actual knowledge” under ERISA § 413’s statute of limitations for fiduciary breach claims. You can read Vanessa and Steve’s analysis here.
Andrew Holly
Andrew is a seasoned trial attorney and a nationally recognized leader in ERISA litigation. He represents clients in complex ERISA, healthcare, tax, and antitrust litigation. Andrew serves as chair of Dorsey's nationally recognized ERISA Litigation Practice Group. He has 20 years' experience representing fiduciaries, plan sponsors, and insurers/plan service providers in ERISA litigation matters. For the last five years, he has been ranked by Chambers as one of the top ERISA litigators in the United States.
Andrew HollyAndrew is a seasoned trial attorney and a nationally recognized le...
Nick BullardNick is a trial partner in Dorsey’s office in Minneapolis. ...
Tim ArendsChair of the Benefits and Compensation practice group, Tim devot...
Shannon BjorklundShannon provides advice and litigation assistance to companies...
Tim GoodmanTim Goodman works with employers on medical plans, retirement pl...
Alan IversonAlan is a litigator in Dorsey’s trial group with a focus on cli...
Stephen P. LuckeSteve represents businesses, employers, insurers, and fiduciarie...
Marianne O'BaraMarianne works regularly with numerous non-U.S. companies and t...
Kirsten SchubertKirsten helps clients large and small navigate all aspects of com...
Michael VovesEmployee Benefits, Minneapolis
